Wednesday, April 14, 2010

A Bryce Harper Update

Here is an update on future National Bryce Harper from MASNsports.com:

Nats likely to take Harper with No. 1 pick

With baseball's First-Year Player Draft still almost two months away, the perception in some circles around the game is the Nationals won't have as easy a choice with the No. 1 pick this season as they did last year, when they took right-hander Stephen Strasburg first overall.

That's not how the Nationals are approaching it.

Barring an injury or a drastic change, the Nationals will likely take 17-year-old catcher Bryce Harper with the first pick in the June Draft. According to a source familiar with the situation, they see Harper as being head and shoulders above anyone else in the 2010 draft class and believe he could reach the majors within 2 1/2 years.

Harper, who has been called "the LeBron James of baseball," completed his GED in December 2009 so he could play junior-college baseball and be eligible for the 2010 draft, rather than finish high school. He is currently playing at the College of Southern Nevada, where he is batting .422 with a .516 on-base percentage, .891 slugging percentage, 15 homers and 42 RBI in 39 games.

The Nationals are pleased with Harper's arrangement, as it makes him easier to scout than he would be if he was in high school. He is already playing with a wood bat, and the junior-college level of competition is higher than what he'd face in high school. What's more, Harper is getting pitched to at Southern Nevada, where most high school teams would pitch around him.

Washington has scouted Harper for the last several years, though its top executives have not watched the 6-foot-3 catcher play yet. The Nationals believe he is as surefire a talent as Jayson Heyward, the outfielder selected by the Atlanta Braves out of high school in 2007 who is starting his rookie year with the team.

According to the source, the Nationals will take the best player available, and the decision is almost as cut-and-dried as last year's decision to take Strasburg.

Harper's advisor, Scott Boras, got Strasburg the richest deal ever given to a draft pick last summer, when he agreed to a four-year, $15.1 million deal with Strasburg just before the Aug. 17 deadline. Boras has said he does not consider Harper to be in the same class as Strasburg, though many scouts see him as a similarly rare talent. It's likely negotations for Harper would be lengthy; the Nationals have not made detailed inquiries about his salary demands, but intend to sign him if they do indeed draft him.

General manager Mike Rizzo has historically preferred college players, but took high school shortstop Justin Upton with the first pick in the 2005 draft when he was with the Arizona Diamondbacks.

Harper, who also throws a 96-mph fastball, was featured on the cover of Sports Illustrated last year, and could project at a number of different positions. He has become an Internet sensation after video surfaced of him hitting a 502-foot home run (albeit with an aluminum bat) at Tropicana Field in St. Petersburg, Fla., last year.

If the Nationals take him, he could eventually pair with Strasburg to give the team two of the most highly-touted (and handsomely paid) prospects in the history of the draft. Right now, it appears that is what the team plans to do.

3 comments:

  1. I read the SI article on this kid. Looks like a can't miss pick. Hopefully, the Nats will be able to afford him with that sleazebag agent, Boras. With all the money that he'll demand, he'd make a better 1st baseman to save on the wear and tear on the knees that he would get as a catcher.

    Tell your Dad that his goofy brother will be attending a tea party rally tomorrow. That should bring some eye rolling!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Aw, Uncle Jim, you are far too smart to be a Tea Party person. I mean, you can disagree with policy all you want, but protesting high taxes when we have lower taxes than all of Europe, and carrying signs that are rapidly getting more militant, racist, ignorant and incendiary? Come on now. Flanagans come from better stuff than that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Aw, Jim, those articles that you refer to only compare federal taxes of each country. By only considering the federal tax burden in the U.S., you leave out the additional layer of taxes imposed by the states (income, sales, intangibles and real estate and personal property taxes)--something not applicable in most countries cited in contrast to the U.S. system so that they can draw the conclusion that we're SO LUCKY that it isn't worse. That's horse-hockey! Ask residents of NY, NJ, California and Massachusetts where the their total tax burden from all sources is well over 50%. And the Messiah, The Anointed One, Honest Ob, is thinking about an additional Value Added Tax (VAT)to pay for all his spending.

    Just sayin'

    ReplyDelete