Well well well. Here we are at the Conference Championships, and here I am 8-0 in my playoff picks. Now we have the top two seeds in both conferences playing for a trip to Super Bowl 50 (confession: I hate that they went to the number. I really wanted it to be Super Bowl L, so you could just draw out the L when you say it. "Super Bowllllllll"). I guess we should get right to it.
AFC Championship Game
New England Patriots at Denver Broncos, 3:05 PM
This is going to hurt my heart. As many folks may know, I have always been a big Tom Brady fan. I started rooting for him when he was at Michigan, since I also decided to be a Michigan fan when I was very little due to the fact that their mascot is the same name as one of my favorite super heroes (Shut up, I was like 5). I have a Brady Michigan jersey. I got a Brady Pats jersey the Christmas before they won their first Super Bowl. So, I support the guy, despite how often he tries to piss off the entire world, and even though he has become possibly the best QB ever which automatically draws the respectful hatred of fans from other cities. I expect him to win this game on Sunday. Why would this hurt my heart?
Cause I want Peyton to win. I do. Desperately. There is nothing as satisfying to someone that loves sports than seeing a beloved figure go out on top. I felt no great passion towards John Elway, but it was awesome seeing him win his 2nd Super Bowl and then retire. I want that for the guy Elway employs now. For as fantastic a QB as he has been, and he is easily Top 5 all time, Peyton Manning will be remembered as a guy that only won 1 Super Bowl. They will ignore that he has a ring when so many others, like Marino, do not, or that the likes of Favre only have one. They will look at the number of playoff losses he has, and not the fact that he was in the playoffs practically every year of his career. Going to three Super Bowls is, in itself, an amazing accomplishment, especially since the Patriots have managed to make it to 6, so AFC appearances have been pretty scarce for teams not from New England.
Denver has a great defense. Denver has a solid run game. Tom Brady doesn't play that well in Denver. It is possible for them to win, for sure. But I just see the Patriots pulling it out because, well, they are the Patriots. Maybe it is a fitting end that Peyton Manning's last game is a loss to Tom Brady. As great as Peyton has been, Tom has always found the way to win more. He and the Patriots will win again Sunday, 27-24.
NFC Championship Game
Arizona Cardinals at Carolina Panthers, 6:40 PM
This game is the one I wanted to see happen the most. The entire season, the Panthers and Cardinals have been the two best teams in the NFC. It hasn't really been close either. Sure, the Seahawks or Vikings had a stretch here and there where they played great, but its been Arizona and Carolina all year. It is going to come down the Carolina defense and the Arizona offense. I think Cam Newton is going to be able to score at least 21 on the Arizona defense. He is the MVP, after all. The real question is whether or not Carson Palmer, David Johnson, and all those WRs can score on Carolina. The Arizona WRs are better than the Panthers secondary, but the front seven of the Panthers D is superb. The Cardinals will have to spread the ball out to take advantage of mismatches in talent that they have.
The past two weeks, Arizona just hasn't looked right. Maybe it is Palmer's dislocated finger. Maybe it is just that they played two good teams in Seattle and Green Bay. Call me crazy, but I don't think they can beat the Panthers right now. Yes, I know that going with the #1 seed is boring, and that we want to see Larry Fitzgerald in the Super Bowl again. Nevertheless, I think this is Cam Newton's season, and his chance to show why he is clearly this year's MVP. Give me the Panthers at home, 23-18.
Can we make it to 10-0 in playoff picks? Who will be in the Super Bowl? Enjoy finding out Sunday.
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
Thursday, January 14, 2016
NFL Playoff Preview and Picks- Divisional Round
Well, I went 4-0 on my picks last week, which is unfortunate because my Skins are out now. Still proud of them for the season they had. Kirk Cousins should expect a contract around $17 million a year, so the same money as Alex Smith or Jay Cutler. I have a few friends that are Vikings fans too. I am happy that they have other sports to concentrate on after that loss. Then the Bengals and Texans lost, one my self-destruction and one by not showing up at all. So, 4-0, and looking for that to continue into the Divisional Round. Let's just call this Episode V: The Home Teams Strike Back.
Saturday
Kansas City Chiefs at New England Patriots, 4:35 pm
The Chiefs destroyed the Texans last week. Just clobbered them. They look like they could actually make a deep run in the playoffs based on that game. However, do you ever bet against the Patriots? That's a good way to lose money. Add in that Jeremy Maclin may not suit up for KC, and the Pats are getting Edelman back, it could be a very long day for Chiefs fans. Their defense can make all the plays, though, that will keep them in the game. We still don't know if Chandler Jones is going to be playing on Sunday either following a bizarre possible OD incident this week. New England is a 5-point favorite right now, and that seems like a pretty good bet. Patriots find a way to win, 24-19.
Green Bay Packers at Arizona Cardinals, 8:15 pm
Well, it was nice of the real Aaron Rodgers to finally show up, huh? It was also a bad time for the Redskins defense to remember that they weren't that good. The Packers looked like their old selves as they eliminated my Skins. But will it continue this week? After all, it was only three and a half weeks ago that the Pack when to Arizona and got destroyed 38-8. I think that the Cardinals are a better team top to bottom, even though playing without Tyrann Matthieu is hurting them. Green Bay will play better than it did last time, but I still have the Cardinals winning in a shoot out, 34-28.
Sunday
Seattle Seahawks at Carolina Panthers, 1:05 pm
The Seahawks are the luckiest damn team I have ever seen. They really had no right winning that game, but a collapse in coverage on a broken play and a shanked kick means they get to go to Carolina and play against the MVP. This is another rematch, as the Panthers went to Seattle in Week 5 and beat the Seahawks 27-23. I think this is Cam Newton's big coming out year, and it would be a waste to see it end so quickly in the playoffs. Plus, Cardinals/Panthers would be a very fun game to watch. I do not expect this one to be a shootout, since both defenses are so good. So, give me the Panthers to win 17-13.
Pittsburgh Steelers at Denver Broncos, 4:40 pm
I am working with the assumption that Big Ben's injury will take some of the zip off his throws, and that Antonio Brown will miss this game after Vontez Burfect tried to decapitate him with his shoulder last week. I also think the return of Peyton Manning will help a lot in the Denver running game. He is so good at changing the calls at the line that the Steelers defense will have to respect the pass, and so Ronnie Hillman and CJ Anderson could have a great day. Lets not forget that this Pittsburgh team probably would have lost last week if it wasn't for the Bengals meltdown. I'll take Denver, Peyton, that defense, the altitude, and a home team sweep, 27-20.
There are my picks. Maybe I will be 8-0 this time next week, or I could be back to .500. Either way, enjoy the games.
Saturday
Kansas City Chiefs at New England Patriots, 4:35 pm
The Chiefs destroyed the Texans last week. Just clobbered them. They look like they could actually make a deep run in the playoffs based on that game. However, do you ever bet against the Patriots? That's a good way to lose money. Add in that Jeremy Maclin may not suit up for KC, and the Pats are getting Edelman back, it could be a very long day for Chiefs fans. Their defense can make all the plays, though, that will keep them in the game. We still don't know if Chandler Jones is going to be playing on Sunday either following a bizarre possible OD incident this week. New England is a 5-point favorite right now, and that seems like a pretty good bet. Patriots find a way to win, 24-19.
Green Bay Packers at Arizona Cardinals, 8:15 pm
Well, it was nice of the real Aaron Rodgers to finally show up, huh? It was also a bad time for the Redskins defense to remember that they weren't that good. The Packers looked like their old selves as they eliminated my Skins. But will it continue this week? After all, it was only three and a half weeks ago that the Pack when to Arizona and got destroyed 38-8. I think that the Cardinals are a better team top to bottom, even though playing without Tyrann Matthieu is hurting them. Green Bay will play better than it did last time, but I still have the Cardinals winning in a shoot out, 34-28.
Sunday
Seattle Seahawks at Carolina Panthers, 1:05 pm
The Seahawks are the luckiest damn team I have ever seen. They really had no right winning that game, but a collapse in coverage on a broken play and a shanked kick means they get to go to Carolina and play against the MVP. This is another rematch, as the Panthers went to Seattle in Week 5 and beat the Seahawks 27-23. I think this is Cam Newton's big coming out year, and it would be a waste to see it end so quickly in the playoffs. Plus, Cardinals/Panthers would be a very fun game to watch. I do not expect this one to be a shootout, since both defenses are so good. So, give me the Panthers to win 17-13.
Pittsburgh Steelers at Denver Broncos, 4:40 pm
I am working with the assumption that Big Ben's injury will take some of the zip off his throws, and that Antonio Brown will miss this game after Vontez Burfect tried to decapitate him with his shoulder last week. I also think the return of Peyton Manning will help a lot in the Denver running game. He is so good at changing the calls at the line that the Steelers defense will have to respect the pass, and so Ronnie Hillman and CJ Anderson could have a great day. Lets not forget that this Pittsburgh team probably would have lost last week if it wasn't for the Bengals meltdown. I'll take Denver, Peyton, that defense, the altitude, and a home team sweep, 27-20.
There are my picks. Maybe I will be 8-0 this time next week, or I could be back to .500. Either way, enjoy the games.
Wednesday, January 6, 2016
NFL Playoff Preview and Picks- Wildcard Weekend
So, the NFL Playoffs are here. That is always a bit bittersweet for me, since it means I will no longer get to watch fellow Syracuse grad Scott Hanson and NFL Redzone each week. It is the greatest invention in modern sports TV history. Playoffs also mean no more fantasy football for me, but I won my league again, so I am ok with that. Finally, the playoffs usually mean that my team is already at home looking towards the draft. But not this year! Yes, somehow, the Washington Redskins won the putrid NFC East with a 9-7 record, and will be hosting a game this weekend. Kirk Cousins is a legit starting QB, Jay Gruden seems to be a good coach, and our idiot owner didn't get in the way. So, for at least a few more days, Skins fans get to scream "You Like That!?" at people. It is a beautiful thing.
Of course, the Skins aren't the only team in the playoff. The best of the best square off starting this weekend in the Wild Card round. There are some tough matchups for the home teams. It wouldn't surprise me if all the Wild Card teams won. So, looking at all of the games individually, what are my picks? Let's find out together!
Saturday:
Kansas City Chiefs at Houston Texans, 4:20 pm
I'm not entirely sure how the Texans did it, but even without a QB and a healthy #1 RB, they made it into the playoffs. Sure, their division was garbage, but all you have to do to make it to the dance is beat enough of the teams on your schedule, and they did. That being said, I think that their ride stops here. The Chiefs are the hottest team in football, having won 10 straight after starting out 1-5. Are they built to wow you with an explosive offense? No, but they have found a way to average 25 points per game, and Alex Smith has played extremely well. Were they expected to be a superb defense? No, but they finished the regular season ranked #3 in scoring defense, allowing only 18 points a game. I just think that the Chiefs are on too much of a role for the Texans to keep up. Give me the Chiefs 20-13.
Pittsburgh Steelers at Cincinnati Bengals, 8:15 pm
This comes down to who is at QB for the Bengals. If it is Andy Dalton, I give the Bengals a much better chance at winning. He was playing at an MVP level before he injured his thumb trying to tackle a player. If it is AJ McCarron, who has looked average during his chance to start, then I am picking the Steelers all the way. The Steelers biggest enemy is themselves. They have all the talent in the world, a Superbowl winning QB and coach, and experience in the playoffs. If they are able to play their game and avoid stupid penalties and turnovers, they will be very tough to beat. Dalton just had his cast removed, but it sounds like the Bengals will start McCarron. I'll take Pittsburgh big, 31-17.
Sunday:
Seattle Seahawks at Minnesota Vikings, 1:05 pm
I respect everything the Vikings have done. They took the division from the Packers. Adrian Peterson seems to be able to run on everyone. Their defense can play great ball when asked to. Bridgewater manages the game well, and can even make big plays when asked. They are a great team. That being said, Seattle is going to win. There is a reason I wanted no part of the Seahawks when the Skins clinched the division. When the Seahawks are on, as they have been for weeks (that little blip vs the Rams notwithstanding) they can beat everyone. Hell, just 5 and a half weeks ago, they went to Minnesota and destroyed the Vikings 38-7. I don't think it will be that lopsided again, but I do think that the Seahawks will move on to face Carolina, 24-16.
Green Bay Packers at Washington Redskins, 4:40 pm
How concerned is the national media about this game? Well, some are wondering, out loud, on TV, whether or not they'd rather have Aaron Rodgers or Kirk Cousins right now. Seriously, that is happening. I can't say that it is all Rodgers' fault. Losing Jordy Nelson threw off the entire season for the Packers. They just haven't looked right. They are 4-6 in their last 10, and that includes the Hail Mary against the Lions. Meanwhile, the Redskins won 3 straight coming into the postseason. Kirk and the offense are clicking. The defense, while letting teams creep back into games, comes up with big plays at the right time. But they Skins also have yet to beat a team with a winning record, so what kind of competition are they really?
Some folks here in DC are super-optimistic. While I think the matchup for the Skins is a great one, it just takes a lot for me to pick them to win. I've watched this team my whole life, even when I was actively rooting for other players on other teams because I liked them in college (hi, Donovan McNabb). I am used to the Skins getting my hopes up and then laying an egg. Yet I have been pleasantly surprised this year. I sat in one of my favorite bars in August, looking at the Skins schedule, and insisting that they would only win 6 games. They won 9 and the division. So, maybe it is the past disappointments that keep me from being confident, or maybe pessimism is a defense mechanism that allows me to be even happier if the Skins do somehow pull it out, like they have so far. Either way, I think I have to pick Aaron Rodgers' experience over this feel-good story and a franchise that is (hopefully) on the rise. I hope I am wrong, though. Packers take it 21-20.
There are my picks. That would set up Seattle at Carolina, Green Bay at Arizona, Pittsburgh at Denver, and KC at New England. Not a bad slate of games for the Divisional round. Enjoy the games.
Of course, the Skins aren't the only team in the playoff. The best of the best square off starting this weekend in the Wild Card round. There are some tough matchups for the home teams. It wouldn't surprise me if all the Wild Card teams won. So, looking at all of the games individually, what are my picks? Let's find out together!
Saturday:
Kansas City Chiefs at Houston Texans, 4:20 pm
I'm not entirely sure how the Texans did it, but even without a QB and a healthy #1 RB, they made it into the playoffs. Sure, their division was garbage, but all you have to do to make it to the dance is beat enough of the teams on your schedule, and they did. That being said, I think that their ride stops here. The Chiefs are the hottest team in football, having won 10 straight after starting out 1-5. Are they built to wow you with an explosive offense? No, but they have found a way to average 25 points per game, and Alex Smith has played extremely well. Were they expected to be a superb defense? No, but they finished the regular season ranked #3 in scoring defense, allowing only 18 points a game. I just think that the Chiefs are on too much of a role for the Texans to keep up. Give me the Chiefs 20-13.
Pittsburgh Steelers at Cincinnati Bengals, 8:15 pm
This comes down to who is at QB for the Bengals. If it is Andy Dalton, I give the Bengals a much better chance at winning. He was playing at an MVP level before he injured his thumb trying to tackle a player. If it is AJ McCarron, who has looked average during his chance to start, then I am picking the Steelers all the way. The Steelers biggest enemy is themselves. They have all the talent in the world, a Superbowl winning QB and coach, and experience in the playoffs. If they are able to play their game and avoid stupid penalties and turnovers, they will be very tough to beat. Dalton just had his cast removed, but it sounds like the Bengals will start McCarron. I'll take Pittsburgh big, 31-17.
Sunday:
Seattle Seahawks at Minnesota Vikings, 1:05 pm
I respect everything the Vikings have done. They took the division from the Packers. Adrian Peterson seems to be able to run on everyone. Their defense can play great ball when asked to. Bridgewater manages the game well, and can even make big plays when asked. They are a great team. That being said, Seattle is going to win. There is a reason I wanted no part of the Seahawks when the Skins clinched the division. When the Seahawks are on, as they have been for weeks (that little blip vs the Rams notwithstanding) they can beat everyone. Hell, just 5 and a half weeks ago, they went to Minnesota and destroyed the Vikings 38-7. I don't think it will be that lopsided again, but I do think that the Seahawks will move on to face Carolina, 24-16.
Green Bay Packers at Washington Redskins, 4:40 pm
How concerned is the national media about this game? Well, some are wondering, out loud, on TV, whether or not they'd rather have Aaron Rodgers or Kirk Cousins right now. Seriously, that is happening. I can't say that it is all Rodgers' fault. Losing Jordy Nelson threw off the entire season for the Packers. They just haven't looked right. They are 4-6 in their last 10, and that includes the Hail Mary against the Lions. Meanwhile, the Redskins won 3 straight coming into the postseason. Kirk and the offense are clicking. The defense, while letting teams creep back into games, comes up with big plays at the right time. But they Skins also have yet to beat a team with a winning record, so what kind of competition are they really?
Some folks here in DC are super-optimistic. While I think the matchup for the Skins is a great one, it just takes a lot for me to pick them to win. I've watched this team my whole life, even when I was actively rooting for other players on other teams because I liked them in college (hi, Donovan McNabb). I am used to the Skins getting my hopes up and then laying an egg. Yet I have been pleasantly surprised this year. I sat in one of my favorite bars in August, looking at the Skins schedule, and insisting that they would only win 6 games. They won 9 and the division. So, maybe it is the past disappointments that keep me from being confident, or maybe pessimism is a defense mechanism that allows me to be even happier if the Skins do somehow pull it out, like they have so far. Either way, I think I have to pick Aaron Rodgers' experience over this feel-good story and a franchise that is (hopefully) on the rise. I hope I am wrong, though. Packers take it 21-20.
There are my picks. That would set up Seattle at Carolina, Green Bay at Arizona, Pittsburgh at Denver, and KC at New England. Not a bad slate of games for the Divisional round. Enjoy the games.
Tuesday, January 5, 2016
My 2016 Baseball Hall of Fame Ballot, If I Had One
Happy New Year! Lots of sports going on right now, but my first focus is on tomorrow's Baseball Hall of Fame announcement. In the past, the BBWAA has been extremely stupid in their voting. There are some years where they do not induct anyone at all into the Hall of Fame. Thankfully, this year seems to one where we are guaranteed at least one Hall of Famer. Ken Griffey Jr has a chance to break Tom Seaver's record of the highest vote percentage ever, and deservedly so. The question will be who joins him. If I had my way, here are the 8 candidates I'd vote for:
1. Ken Griffey Jr
- Obvious pick. He may be the best player of the 1990s, and took the game by storm.
2. Jeff Bagwell
- The other half of the Killer B's with Hall of Famer Craig Biggio. The only reason he isn't in the HOF already is the unsubstantiated claim that he may have used PEDs. Unlike with Bonds, Clemens, Sosa, or McGwire, there is absolutely no proof to support these claims at all. Bagwell deserves to be in.
3. Mike Piazza
- One of the greatest offensive catchers of all time, he has also suffered the same fate of Jeff Bagwell. Again, no proof. Piazza should be in.
4. Tim Raines
- The second best leadoff hitter of his generation, if not all time, who is overlooked because Ricky Henderson On-base percentage numbers that rival those of Tony Gwynn. I am unsure as to why Raines has been overlooked for so long. I think this could be the year he finally gets in.
5. Edgar Martinez
- One of the greatest hitters I have ever seen, Edgar Martinez is every bit a Hall of Famer as anyone else on this list. Career .312 hitter, 7-time All Star, and the backbone of those 1990s Mariners teams with Griffey, he is perhaps the most beloved figure in Seattle baseball history. The hang up here is that he was primarily a DH. While that is an excellent point, we should also look at one of the one-dimensional defensive players already enshrined in the Hall. Ozzie Smith, the Wizard of Oz, is a career .266 hitter. His .666 career OPS is far less than Martinez's .933 OPS. He is a defense-first player, but is in the Hall of Fame. Why keep out Martinez for being a mainly-offensive minded player?
6. Mike Mussina
- He played his entire career in the AL East at the time of both the Yankees dynasty and the Red Sox resurgence. He was the ace for the O's and the Yankees. He could have stayed on for two or three more seasons after his retirement, and would have almost certainly reached 300 wins. Instead, he retired, and his candidacy has suffered due to it. He is also the victim of pitching in the same era of so many great pitchers. Still, his case is very strong.
7. Trevor Hoffman
- Trevor Hoffman is the second best closer of all time. At the time of his retirement, he was the greatest closer of all time. Mariano Rivera passed him after Hoffman retired. In modern baseball, the closer is a legitimate and important role. If we are willing to put in Rivera, who is almost certainly going to be in the Hall of Fame, then we must put in Trevor Hoffman.
8. Curt Schilling
- I think that Curt Schilling is a loudmouth, a blowhard, an idiot, and a gasbag. However, I also think he was a fantastic pitcher. While putting up borderline-HOF regular season numbers, his post season stats put him over the top. He went 11-2 with a 2.33 ERA and a 0.97 WHIP in 19 starts and 133.3 career playoff innings. Schilling won three World Series, was the MVP of the 1993 NLCS, and the co-MVP of the World Series with Randy Johnson in 2001.
There are other candidates that are close, such as Gary Sheffield, Larry Walker, Billy Wagner, and Jeff Kent. There are also the PED-linked (with proof) players. Eventually, they should be in the Hall of Fame. They just should. Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens were probably Hall of Fame-worthy before their late-career explosions. That is what is so depressing about it. So, yes, they should be in the Hall at some point. However, until the HOF and the BBWAA decides how to deal with their inclusion (such as a mention on the plaque, or a special place just for them) I'd say keep them out.
So, there you are. We will see if the BBWAA actually elects anyone other than Griffey, though I think that Piazza has a great chance. I would love to see Bagwell and Raines in as well, just to make some more room on the ballot with other deserving players coming in the next few years.
1. Ken Griffey Jr
- Obvious pick. He may be the best player of the 1990s, and took the game by storm.
2. Jeff Bagwell
- The other half of the Killer B's with Hall of Famer Craig Biggio. The only reason he isn't in the HOF already is the unsubstantiated claim that he may have used PEDs. Unlike with Bonds, Clemens, Sosa, or McGwire, there is absolutely no proof to support these claims at all. Bagwell deserves to be in.
3. Mike Piazza
- One of the greatest offensive catchers of all time, he has also suffered the same fate of Jeff Bagwell. Again, no proof. Piazza should be in.
4. Tim Raines
- The second best leadoff hitter of his generation, if not all time, who is overlooked because Ricky Henderson On-base percentage numbers that rival those of Tony Gwynn. I am unsure as to why Raines has been overlooked for so long. I think this could be the year he finally gets in.
5. Edgar Martinez
- One of the greatest hitters I have ever seen, Edgar Martinez is every bit a Hall of Famer as anyone else on this list. Career .312 hitter, 7-time All Star, and the backbone of those 1990s Mariners teams with Griffey, he is perhaps the most beloved figure in Seattle baseball history. The hang up here is that he was primarily a DH. While that is an excellent point, we should also look at one of the one-dimensional defensive players already enshrined in the Hall. Ozzie Smith, the Wizard of Oz, is a career .266 hitter. His .666 career OPS is far less than Martinez's .933 OPS. He is a defense-first player, but is in the Hall of Fame. Why keep out Martinez for being a mainly-offensive minded player?
6. Mike Mussina
- He played his entire career in the AL East at the time of both the Yankees dynasty and the Red Sox resurgence. He was the ace for the O's and the Yankees. He could have stayed on for two or three more seasons after his retirement, and would have almost certainly reached 300 wins. Instead, he retired, and his candidacy has suffered due to it. He is also the victim of pitching in the same era of so many great pitchers. Still, his case is very strong.
7. Trevor Hoffman
- Trevor Hoffman is the second best closer of all time. At the time of his retirement, he was the greatest closer of all time. Mariano Rivera passed him after Hoffman retired. In modern baseball, the closer is a legitimate and important role. If we are willing to put in Rivera, who is almost certainly going to be in the Hall of Fame, then we must put in Trevor Hoffman.
8. Curt Schilling
- I think that Curt Schilling is a loudmouth, a blowhard, an idiot, and a gasbag. However, I also think he was a fantastic pitcher. While putting up borderline-HOF regular season numbers, his post season stats put him over the top. He went 11-2 with a 2.33 ERA and a 0.97 WHIP in 19 starts and 133.3 career playoff innings. Schilling won three World Series, was the MVP of the 1993 NLCS, and the co-MVP of the World Series with Randy Johnson in 2001.
There are other candidates that are close, such as Gary Sheffield, Larry Walker, Billy Wagner, and Jeff Kent. There are also the PED-linked (with proof) players. Eventually, they should be in the Hall of Fame. They just should. Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens were probably Hall of Fame-worthy before their late-career explosions. That is what is so depressing about it. So, yes, they should be in the Hall at some point. However, until the HOF and the BBWAA decides how to deal with their inclusion (such as a mention on the plaque, or a special place just for them) I'd say keep them out.
So, there you are. We will see if the BBWAA actually elects anyone other than Griffey, though I think that Piazza has a great chance. I would love to see Bagwell and Raines in as well, just to make some more room on the ballot with other deserving players coming in the next few years.
Wednesday, December 2, 2015
OrangeMan or (The Unexpected Sadness of Coaching Searches)
The past few nights, some time around 4 am, I have stumbled to this desktop, or gotten on my tablet, and opened twitter. Instead of scrolling through to see what the random celebrities, wrestling personas, and sportswriters I follow have to say, I immediately search the following phrase- "Syracuse Coach". I do this because, after a 4-8 season, my alma mater Syracuse University fired their football coach Scott Shafer. It was time for him to go. The football team, while putting in some great efforts in losses to much better teams like Clemson and LSU, once again failed to qualify for bowl eligibility. There were other problems as well. Shafer let QB Eric Dungey play when he may have had a concussion, and at best was beat up pretty bad. Shafer started lashing out at the media, which you can really only get away with when you have the clout of winning behind you, like Nick Saban. Shafer, having gone 3-9 and 4-8 the past two years, had none of that. So, new AD Mark Coyle decided to go in a different direction. I have no problem with that. Shafer wasn't winning, and wasn't his guy. We move on.
So what now? What comes next? That is where the problem starts.
Since I arrived on Syracuse's campus as a bearded freshman in the late summer of 2004, there have been two constants about Orange sports- The basketball team is pretty damn good, and the football team is pretty damn bad. I got to suffer through the Greg Robinson era. I felt the pain when Doug Marrone, who looked like he had turned Cuse back into a perennial bowl contender, left to coach the Buffalo Bills, leaving Shafer behind to coach. I have seen attendance drop, and every ACC football team other than Wake Forest use us as a doormat. Long story short, the Syracuse football head coaching position isn't what it used to be. The previous decade has made placed us firmly in the bottom third of Power 5 conference coaching position. How can we attract a good candidate?
It doesn't help, of course, that 15 schools needed a new head coach, whether by firing or retiring. So, the powers that be decided to take a proactive approach and fly to meet candidates even before Syracuse's last game of the season. The man to get, according to everyone with an opinion, was Oregon offensive coordinator Scott Frost. He is one of the masterminds behind the high-octane offense that put Nike U on the map, and has learned from two of the better college coaches in Chip Kelly and Mark Helfrich. How amazing would that offense be in the weather-controlled environment of the Carrier Dome? He was an obvious choice. So Coyle went. He met. He offered $1.2 million a year, roughly what Shafer was paid. And then Frost took the opening at 0-12 UCF.
0-12.
Winless.
He chose them over Jim Brown's alma mater. Over Donovan McNabb's alma mater. Over the school that made Chandler Jones, Art Monk, Marvin Harrison, Larry Csonka, Ernie Davis, Floyd Little, and Dwight Freeney, among many others.
That is how far Syracuse has sunk. We can't even be a stepping stone for a super-ambitious young coach. I say stepping stone because there is no chance Frost stays at UCF for long. He is simply biding his time until his alma mater, Nebraska, decides to fire their head coach. That, by the way, may not be long since this is the school that fired Bo Pelini, and all he did was win at least 9 games a year every year.
So what now? What comes next? The problem continues.
Now that we know we lost out on Coyle's main guy, alumni are starting to get nervous. What if we can't get any good candidate? What if we end up with some retread old coach like Greg Schiano? Sure, he was good at Rutgers after a while, but his epic failure in the NFL must have hurt his appeal a bit.
What if the next best option takes a different job? Apparently Ohio State co-defensive coordinator Chris Ash may be the next man up. There is also Bowling Green head coach Dino Babers, who would bring that same spread offense to the Dome, but would bring some head coaching experience as well. Babers was rumored to have locked up the UCF job, but after denying he took it (he wanted to concentrate on his team playing in the MAC championship game this Friday) had it taken away. Either one of those might be attractive names to Syracuse. They may also be attractive names to Rutgers. Or UVA. Or Minnesota.
Syracuse fans are hurt right now. We are the jilted lover. The guy we thought we loved, the rough, hard-nosed type that the players all loved, turned out to not be that great of a coach. Then, the hot new guy we fell in love with at first sight (His name is Frost, for Christ's sake. How perfect would that be at Cuse?) spurned us for some Florida bimbo he will leave in a little bit anyway for a more familiar Midwestern love. We are afraid that we won't find the right coach for us. We are even more afraid that there just isn't a coach for us at all. We might be doomed to wander the landscape of college football alone, without someone to nurture the program back to prominence. If Ash or Babers isn't the pick, take other jobs, and we have to dive even deeper into the potential head coaches pool, we may be inconsolable. Meanwhile, at prime recruiting time, those young men are seeing us get rejected and thinking, "Why should I go there? No one likes them anyway."
Syracuse football will have a head coach next season. It may be the 7th choice. It may be the 2nd choice. We know it won't be the 1st. As great as Syracuse sports have been so far this year (men'ss and women's basketball both ranked, National Champions in field hockey and men's cross country), this massive cloud hanging over the football program just blocks all that beautiful sun. Its a cloud that will not go away until we have a new coach the players, administration, alumni and fans can be excited about and proud of.
So what now? What comes next? The problem has to end eventually.
Until then, we'll be crying in the corner listening to Adele.
So what now? What comes next? That is where the problem starts.
Since I arrived on Syracuse's campus as a bearded freshman in the late summer of 2004, there have been two constants about Orange sports- The basketball team is pretty damn good, and the football team is pretty damn bad. I got to suffer through the Greg Robinson era. I felt the pain when Doug Marrone, who looked like he had turned Cuse back into a perennial bowl contender, left to coach the Buffalo Bills, leaving Shafer behind to coach. I have seen attendance drop, and every ACC football team other than Wake Forest use us as a doormat. Long story short, the Syracuse football head coaching position isn't what it used to be. The previous decade has made placed us firmly in the bottom third of Power 5 conference coaching position. How can we attract a good candidate?
It doesn't help, of course, that 15 schools needed a new head coach, whether by firing or retiring. So, the powers that be decided to take a proactive approach and fly to meet candidates even before Syracuse's last game of the season. The man to get, according to everyone with an opinion, was Oregon offensive coordinator Scott Frost. He is one of the masterminds behind the high-octane offense that put Nike U on the map, and has learned from two of the better college coaches in Chip Kelly and Mark Helfrich. How amazing would that offense be in the weather-controlled environment of the Carrier Dome? He was an obvious choice. So Coyle went. He met. He offered $1.2 million a year, roughly what Shafer was paid. And then Frost took the opening at 0-12 UCF.
0-12.
Winless.
He chose them over Jim Brown's alma mater. Over Donovan McNabb's alma mater. Over the school that made Chandler Jones, Art Monk, Marvin Harrison, Larry Csonka, Ernie Davis, Floyd Little, and Dwight Freeney, among many others.
That is how far Syracuse has sunk. We can't even be a stepping stone for a super-ambitious young coach. I say stepping stone because there is no chance Frost stays at UCF for long. He is simply biding his time until his alma mater, Nebraska, decides to fire their head coach. That, by the way, may not be long since this is the school that fired Bo Pelini, and all he did was win at least 9 games a year every year.
So what now? What comes next? The problem continues.
Now that we know we lost out on Coyle's main guy, alumni are starting to get nervous. What if we can't get any good candidate? What if we end up with some retread old coach like Greg Schiano? Sure, he was good at Rutgers after a while, but his epic failure in the NFL must have hurt his appeal a bit.
What if the next best option takes a different job? Apparently Ohio State co-defensive coordinator Chris Ash may be the next man up. There is also Bowling Green head coach Dino Babers, who would bring that same spread offense to the Dome, but would bring some head coaching experience as well. Babers was rumored to have locked up the UCF job, but after denying he took it (he wanted to concentrate on his team playing in the MAC championship game this Friday) had it taken away. Either one of those might be attractive names to Syracuse. They may also be attractive names to Rutgers. Or UVA. Or Minnesota.
Syracuse fans are hurt right now. We are the jilted lover. The guy we thought we loved, the rough, hard-nosed type that the players all loved, turned out to not be that great of a coach. Then, the hot new guy we fell in love with at first sight (His name is Frost, for Christ's sake. How perfect would that be at Cuse?) spurned us for some Florida bimbo he will leave in a little bit anyway for a more familiar Midwestern love. We are afraid that we won't find the right coach for us. We are even more afraid that there just isn't a coach for us at all. We might be doomed to wander the landscape of college football alone, without someone to nurture the program back to prominence. If Ash or Babers isn't the pick, take other jobs, and we have to dive even deeper into the potential head coaches pool, we may be inconsolable. Meanwhile, at prime recruiting time, those young men are seeing us get rejected and thinking, "Why should I go there? No one likes them anyway."
Syracuse football will have a head coach next season. It may be the 7th choice. It may be the 2nd choice. We know it won't be the 1st. As great as Syracuse sports have been so far this year (men'ss and women's basketball both ranked, National Champions in field hockey and men's cross country), this massive cloud hanging over the football program just blocks all that beautiful sun. Its a cloud that will not go away until we have a new coach the players, administration, alumni and fans can be excited about and proud of.
So what now? What comes next? The problem has to end eventually.
Until then, we'll be crying in the corner listening to Adele.
Monday, October 5, 2015
How to Fix the Nationals? Part 2
Before I even got a chance to write this, the Nationals took the most obvious step towards changing things from last season: They fired Matt Williams this morning. Look, he is a really nice guy, knows the game (especially hitting) pretty well. However, he was completely in over his head with this team. He has no idea how to manage pitching, which at one point was this team's strength. He lost the clubhouse and the fans. He had to go. I am sure he will end up on his feet somewhere soon, though, as a great hitting coach.
The more surprising move is that the Nats fired the entire coaching staff. Many of those guys, especially beloved bench coach Randy Knorr, have been there since the team either came to DC, or before the franchise became good. It will be tough losing them all, though I am sure they will all have major league jobs next season if they so desire. I could still envision Randy Knorr getting an interview for the head job with the Nats if he chooses.
So, now that Matt Williams is gone, who takes over a team with so much talent and so little to show for it? Barry Svrluga of the Washington Post wrote a great piece looking at various options, the most intriguing to me being Bud Black, Dave Martinez, and Ron Wotus. All three have some sort of managerial experience, even as a bench coach. Bud Black clearly has the most time as a leader, even though his time in San Diego wasn't spectacular, it was solid for a team that didn't want to spend much money. Plus, he understands pitching much better than Williams. Both Martinez and more-so Wotus come from under the tutelage of winning managers, and may just need the chance to shine on their own.
There are other names out there for sure. MASN's Byron Kerr brings up two interesting options, both with a JR after their name- Nats AAA manager Billy Gardner, Jr and Orioles Hall of Famer Cal Ripken, Jr. Call was a popular name when Matt Williams was hired, and would be viewed as something of a shot across the bow of that team in Baltimore. However, he has zero managerial experience, and coming off of Williams' failures, I doubt that would be an option. Gardner has managed in the minors for 21 years, was the 2014 International League Manager of the Year, but his Syracuse Chiefs struggled to a 66-78 record this year. It may not be his time just yet.
The final name I would like to toss out, just because we know he can win and has the Hall of Fame clout to get guys to listen to him, is Tony La Russa. I know, he is retired and has a front office position with the Diamondbacks. However, the allure of being able to manage Bryce Harper and Max Scherzer for an extended period of time has to be appealing on some level to anyone that loves the game of baseball as much as La Russa does. He is the type of manager that could come in, even at 71 (just turned 71 on 10/4. Happy Birthday!), get guys to buy in, and win a championship. Just an idea.
So there you have it. The Nats search for a manager has officially begun. The free agents will all be gone soon, and the appropriate moves have to be made. For a team that had such high hopes, this season was a massive failure and extreme disappointment. It is possible to fix the Nationals. But will that fix be an easy one?
The more surprising move is that the Nats fired the entire coaching staff. Many of those guys, especially beloved bench coach Randy Knorr, have been there since the team either came to DC, or before the franchise became good. It will be tough losing them all, though I am sure they will all have major league jobs next season if they so desire. I could still envision Randy Knorr getting an interview for the head job with the Nats if he chooses.
So, now that Matt Williams is gone, who takes over a team with so much talent and so little to show for it? Barry Svrluga of the Washington Post wrote a great piece looking at various options, the most intriguing to me being Bud Black, Dave Martinez, and Ron Wotus. All three have some sort of managerial experience, even as a bench coach. Bud Black clearly has the most time as a leader, even though his time in San Diego wasn't spectacular, it was solid for a team that didn't want to spend much money. Plus, he understands pitching much better than Williams. Both Martinez and more-so Wotus come from under the tutelage of winning managers, and may just need the chance to shine on their own.
There are other names out there for sure. MASN's Byron Kerr brings up two interesting options, both with a JR after their name- Nats AAA manager Billy Gardner, Jr and Orioles Hall of Famer Cal Ripken, Jr. Call was a popular name when Matt Williams was hired, and would be viewed as something of a shot across the bow of that team in Baltimore. However, he has zero managerial experience, and coming off of Williams' failures, I doubt that would be an option. Gardner has managed in the minors for 21 years, was the 2014 International League Manager of the Year, but his Syracuse Chiefs struggled to a 66-78 record this year. It may not be his time just yet.
The final name I would like to toss out, just because we know he can win and has the Hall of Fame clout to get guys to listen to him, is Tony La Russa. I know, he is retired and has a front office position with the Diamondbacks. However, the allure of being able to manage Bryce Harper and Max Scherzer for an extended period of time has to be appealing on some level to anyone that loves the game of baseball as much as La Russa does. He is the type of manager that could come in, even at 71 (just turned 71 on 10/4. Happy Birthday!), get guys to buy in, and win a championship. Just an idea.
So there you have it. The Nats search for a manager has officially begun. The free agents will all be gone soon, and the appropriate moves have to be made. For a team that had such high hopes, this season was a massive failure and extreme disappointment. It is possible to fix the Nationals. But will that fix be an easy one?
Friday, October 2, 2015
How to Fix the Nationals? Part 1
It goes without saying that my beloved Washington Nationals crapped the bed this season. Aside from Bryce Harper's MVP campaign, there is very little to be happy about. Sure, Stephen Strasburg has been excellent since coming back from his injury. However, his injury history itself is a problem, much like Jayson Werth, Ryan Zimmerman, and now Anthony Rendon. Of course, the massive issue of an inept manager could be the biggest issue, but I will be saving that for Part 2 of this piece. Instead, Part 1 will look at the projected 25-man roster for next year as I see it, and how I would tweak it to make the team better. I think that GM Mike Rizzo, pictured above, should listen to these. This also assumes the loss of all free agents the team has, so Ian Desmond, Jordan Zimmermann, Denard Span, Doug Fister, and some bullpen arms/bench players. We'll start with the position players:
Starters in italics:
1B: Ryan Zimmerman, Clint Robinson
2B: Danny Espinosa, Trea Turner
3B: Anthony Rendon
SS: Yunel Escobar
C: Wilson Ramos, Jose Lobaton
LF: Jayson Werth, Tyler Moore
CF: Michael A Taylor, Matt den Dekker
RF: Bryce Harper
Aside from losing Denard Span to free agency, which I am still not sure is going to happen considering how much better the team played with Span in the lineup, this is how I see the starters and the bench. Michael A. Taylor starts in CF to replace Span. Yunel Escobar moves over to his natural position of SS because Desmond is gone. This also moves Anthony Rendon back to 3B, which is his best position. The question will be who starts at 2B. Danny Espinosa certainly earned a chance to start with his fill-in duty this year, and isn't a free agent until 2018. However, GM Mike Rizzo may choose to keep the super utility man on the bench and start either Trea Turner at 2B (where he has been playing since he was called up), or a more natural 2B like Wilmer Difo. Both Espinosa and Turner are Clint Robinson has had a stellar rookie campaign, is a great left-handed bat off the bench, and can play 1B, 3B, or the corner outfield positions. Matt Den Dekker can play all three outfield positions, has shown power himself, and is another lefty option. Switch-hitting Lobaton will once again be the backup, but may earn himself more playing time if Wilson Ramos has another down year.
There is some talk of adding another bat to the lineup. I don't think that is necessary. Given that the team has all of those bench players under contract for significant amounts of time, relying on them and a potent-when-healthy lineup should be the way to go, especially if the Lerner family doesn't want to spend much money. The pitchers, on the other hand, could be a different story.
Starting Rotation
1. Max Scherzer. RHP
2. Stephen Strasburg, RHP
3. Gio Gonzalez, LHP
4. Joe Ross, RHP
5. _____________
That 5th spot will be a pretty big hole to fill if the Nationals do not re-sign Jordan Zimmermann. Jordan is, quite simply, the best pitcher in the history of the Washington Nationals franchise (2005-present). He was also the most consistent pitcher. Replacing what he brought will be extremely difficult. However, there may only be enough money to keep him or Strasburg along with Max, and Strasburg, when he is healthy and focused, has the better stuff. So, what does the team do if it loses Zimmermann? Top prospect LHP Lucas Giolito may be ready, though he is only 21 and has never pitched above AA. The team could use a placeholding starter like Taylor Jordan, or move Tanner Roark back to the rotation full time until Giolito has some more experience. There may be a cheap veteran on the market as well, a la Dan Haren a few years ago. Even with that big hole at the #5 spot, however, the rotation isn't the biggest issue. That is clearly the bullpen.
Bullpen
1. Jonathan Papelbon, RHP
2. Drew Storen, RHP
3. Casey Janssen, RHP
4. Blake Trienan, RHP
5. Craig Stammen, RHP
6. Tanner Roark, RHP
7. Felipe Rivero, LHP
Yeah, there are a few issues there. First, only having one lefty reliever is foolish, even if Felipe has shown that he is probably the best arm out of the bullpen. Losing Matt Thornton to free agency will be a big blow, and is one I personally feel should be avoided. Here is how you make room to keep him, and add some more dependable arms:
1- Buy out Casey Janssen.
Janssen has a $1.5 million buyout on his projected $7 million mutual option this offseason. He cannot come back to the team for that much money. Instead, he should be bought out, and the money saved should be used to re-sign Thornton. If Thornton is not the option, then bring up lefty Matt Grace full time in the 'pen.
2- Keep Blake Trienan in AAA
Trienan has a power arm. He can get up to 99 on the gun. The problem is, he only throws straight fastballs, and has no go-to get-out pitch, like a great changeup or breaking ball. Opposing teams have figured him out. He has to stay in AAA Syracuse until he develops that second or third pitch.
3- Trade/dump Papelbon and Storen
Jonathan Papelbon is a cancer. He has proven to be that by headhunting against Manny Machado, and starting a fight with the MVP Bryce Harper. He was brought to DC in a move that proved to be a massive mistake. After he arrived, the entire bullpen went to hell and the Nats collapsed. I don't care that he is due $11 million guaranteed next year, or that he has a partial no trade clause. If I am Mike Rizzo, I would promise to pay at least 3/4th of his contract, or just pay it in full and release him. Drew Storen, whose amazing fall from grace the second Papelbon arrived is worthy of a Greek tragedy, would be better served elsewhere as well. Since Storen has shown that, when he has the faith of the organization behind him he can be a reliable closer, he could be a valuable trade piece, perhaps as part of a deal to get a new starter. However, Rizzo holds a grudge, so I imagine we would have seen the last of Drew Storen in a Nats uniform.
4- Sign Darren O'Day
O'Day is an unrestricted free agent this offseason, after spending some great years in Baltimore. He is coming off the best season of his career, and was a 2015 All Star. O'Day has shown to be reliable and durable, can be an excellent set up man, or could even close. He would be a fantastic addition to the bullpen. I, for one, was arguing that the team should have traded for him during the year instead of Papelbon. Who knows what would have happened then?
The bullpen, after these moves, would look like this:
1. Matt Thornton, LHP
2. Felipe Rivero, LHP
3. Craig Stammen, RHP
4. Darren O'Day, RHP
5. Tanner Roark, RHP
6. ________
7. ________
The final two spots could be won in Spring Training, or filled by another free agent signing. AJ Cole, Sammy Solis, Erik Davis, or Rafael Martin would all be solid options. I, personally, believe that Rivero has the stuff to be an extremely effective closer, with O'Day as his set up man. I think that this is still an improvement over the current bullpen situation.
So there you have it, a rough look at next season's 25 man roster, with some major changes to the bullpen. Will all of this matter, of course, if Matt Williams returns as manager? Stay tuned for Part 2 to find out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)